The report is the product

What we actually found, at real scale

In August 2026 we ran real, honestly-identified crawls (see our crawler policy) against 80 seeded public-agency websites across four separate populations: suburban park districts, downstate/rural park districts, public libraries, and municipalities. Of those 80, 41 entities actually had documents we could reach and audit — the rest were blocked, unreachable, or where our crawl didn't reach a public document library. We only count what we actually scanned: 1,349 files, 36,587 pages.

Population
Seeded
With data
Files
Pages
Fails ≥1 check
Park districts, suburban
20
12
400
11,446
91.8%
Park districts, rural / downstate
20
13
407
6,006
96.3%
Public libraries
20
9
348
4,519
83.3%
Municipalities
20
7
194
14,616
99.0%

Rates differ enough between populations that a single blended number would hide the real picture — that's why we don't report one. Municipalities also had the lowest yield of the four populations (7 of 20 seeded entities produced usable documents), the smallest sample here — its rate is real, but weight it accordingly.

A tag tree is not the same as a passing document. Of the 887 files in this survey that already had a tag tree in place, 87.8% still failed at least one other check — most often a missing title (60.8% of tagged files), missing image descriptions (54.7%), or a viewer not set to display the title at all (48.9%). If your documents "came out of Word" and you've assumed that settles it, this is the number that says otherwise.

All 10 failure types found, ranked

Across all 1,349 files audited — no black-box score, every row below traces to a specific structural check.

Finding
Files affected
Share of all files
No document title set
539
40.0%
Images missing text descriptions (alt text)
485
36.0%
No tagging structure at all (untagged document)
462
34.2%
Not set to display the document title in the viewer
434
32.2%
Links give no destination information ("click here")
261
19.3%
Tables missing header labels
199
14.8%
No document language set
181
13.4%
Not marked as a tagged document
173
12.8%
Heading levels skip a step
63
4.7%
No selectable text at all (scanned image, needs OCR)
5
0.4%

We don't publish which specific agencies these numbers came from — these are prospects, not case studies. Your own audit's results.csv gives you the same breakdown for your own documents, file by file.

The file below is the full aggregate report, in the same plain-English format every client receives for their own documents — written for whoever has to explain this to a board, not an engineer.

Download the real sample report (.md)

Every audit also includes a results.csv with one row per file and one column per check, for whoever handles the fix.

PDF accessibility audits for public agencies

Find out which of your PDFs would fail an accessibility complaint — the deadline moved, the risk didn't.

Reologix scans every agenda, budget, and public notice your agency has ever published and checks it against the same structural rules a screen reader relies on. The audit is free. You only pay if there's something worth fixing.

No software to install. Send a folder or a link list — results back the same day.
Illustrative example. For a real, downloadable audit report, see below.
Since 1990
Title II's duty not to discriminate has applied for over three decades. The new rule just gave it a technical yardstick.
2027 / 2028
DOJ's April 2026 interim rule pushed the WCAG compliance clock to April 2027 (50k+ jurisdictions) and April 2028 (special districts & smaller entities).
$5–$25
Per page, the going market rate for manual PDF remediation today.
Published vendor pricing, 2026
The compliance date isn't the risk date. April 2028 is when DOJ can point at a specific WCAG failure on your site. It's not when the underlying obligation starts — that's already the law. A complaint about an inaccessible PDF can land on your desk tomorrow, deadline or not.
How it works

Three steps, no meetings required

You don't need to know what a tag tree is. You need to know which documents are a liability and which pages to fix first.

01

Send us the documents

A shared folder, a calendar page full of agenda links, or a whole document library. We pull everything down, one request at a time, respecting the site along the way.

02

We run the structural audit — free

Every file is opened at the object level — tag tree, headings, alt text, table headers, link descriptions, language, scanned-text detection — the same signals assistive technology reads. No charge, no catch.

03

You get a report, and a quote only if you need one

A spreadsheet for your IT team, a two-page summary for the board, and — only for what's actually broken — a per-page remediation quote.

What we actually check

Every finding traces back to a real structural check

No guesswork, no black-box AI score. Each line in your report maps to a specific, inspectable property of the PDF itself.

TAG TREE
Whether the document has any accessibility structure at all — untagged files fail every downstream check.
LANGUAGE
Whether a document language is set and valid, so screen readers use the right pronunciation rules.
TITLE
Whether the file has a real title, and whether the viewer is set to display it instead of the filename.
IMAGES
How many images exist versus how many have a real, non-empty description attached.
TABLES
Whether data tables have header cells a screen reader can announce, or just look like a grid of text.
LINKS
How many links give no destination information beyond "click here."
SCANNED TEXT
Whether the page is real text or a scanned image with nothing for a screen reader to read at all.
HEADINGS
Whether heading levels exist and follow a sane order, so the document has a navigable outline.
Pricing

The audit is free. You pay to fix, not to find out.

Finding the problem costs us almost nothing to run, so it costs you nothing. Fixing it is real work — that's the line item your agency already budgets for.

Step one
Free audit
$0always

Every document you send us, scanned at no cost. This is how you find out what's actually broken before spending anything.

  • Any folder or link list, any size
  • results.csv + plain-English summary
  • Delivered same day
  • No card, no meeting, no subscription
Get your free audit
Ongoing
District-wide
Custom

For a county, district, or multi-department agency that publishes constantly and wants this handled, not repeated.

  • Recurring audits across every department
  • Discounted per-page remediation rate
  • Quarterly board-ready compliance report
  • One direct contact, not a ticket queue
Talk to Radu
Every plan can be invoiced monthly or annually against a PO — no subscription portal required.
Not sure what tier fits?

Send the free audit first. The results tell us — and you — whether this is a $200 fix or a district-wide contract.

Ask first
RC
Radu Cuciulan, Founder
Chicago, IL

I run Reologix out of Chicago, and I personally review every audit before it goes back to you. If you'd rather talk this through than read a pricing page, email me directly and I'll answer — not a sales queue, not a chatbot.

[email protected]

Before your next public records request

See exactly what's in your document library.

Send us five files or five thousand. The audit is free, and it comes back the same day.